I've been off for a couple of years but now I'm back. And I have a whole lot to say about what's soing on. We are finally getting somewhere as a society.
I've been saying for years that the IRS needs to rip a new one for Christians. Spending hard-earned money to "save" people and brainwashing innocent children, precluding them from real knowledge and serious ideas that are so freeing and liberating. You know you're just a monkey's ass, an atom bumped into another atom, by Accident, and now you are a collection of cells, with genital urges and just the right lack of inhibition that natural selection needs in order to grow taller men with longer penises and juicy, curvy ladies with big torpedoes.
I don't care if it's your hard earned money and you feel like you can give it to a church. You should be punished for that. You should have to pay more than what you give to some church, to the government, so the government can fund the Islam people too (cause it's a free country), and help control the population. America started its government so the people could serve it and we can have peace and everybody could be on the same page. But you have all these people that make way too much money. They should just take people's ideas and pay them the average salary for that year, and sell the ideas and use the money and the proceeds to control the population and neuter cats and dogs and give more money to pharmaceutical companies which are already struggling to try to make the best drugs for us so that we don't have to feel things, and when we suffer depression because we don't have as much money as someone else, we can go to the doctor and he can give us a pill to make us happy so we're not suffering. So you need to have money to do that, and if people get to keep all their money, how are the unhappy people supposed to cope with life? It's not fair.
And another thing is that video games cost a hell of a lot more than books. (I said before that books written before 1960 should be made illegal cause they are brainwashing people, except for the confessions of Rousseau, cause that was literature.) So it's not fair, because if someone just reads dumb books, they spend less money than someone who plays video games and is modern and deserves more money cause they are enjoying the new cool things in society and helping society progress. So the people that read books should give some of their money to the people that play video games so it's fair and even.
I have a lot more ideas I want to share with you all, but I have to go because I'm late for a three some. So I'll be back in a little bit.
Friday, October 23, 2015
Thursday, March 31, 2011
I Am Scientific
I don't know about you, but I am scientific. I believe in the superiority of science. I believe that you don't need reasons for things, like what Christians claim. That's why I am really enjoying this little book by Immanuel Kant. Even though he was a Christian, he knew somehow that these idiotic people in the Middle Ages were crazy, because they thought up actual logical reasons for believing in God. Absurd! Everybody knows that believing in God is illogical. That's why I believe in Science and Progress. And I love scientists today, because they are so smart and they know so much more about everything than people before them, that they don't even need to get caught up in reasons for things. They already know these things and they help the rest of us wake up to reality and forget about archaic notions like God.
What I love about science is that any good scientist believes in the Big Bang Theory. What's really awesome about that is that scientists have proven that the law of inertia was created after the Big Bang Theory. Because something (or anything, or everything) came out of nothing by Chance, the law of inertia was developed right after it. In other words, before the Big Bang, an object that was standing still or didn't exist could still move or change its makeup without the interference of another object. But the cool thing about the Big Bang is that it changed all that. After the Big Bang, you have the law of inertia, which basically says that an object that is standing still can't move unless acted on by another object.
So, what I really love about the Big Bang is that it can actually create new scientific laws. Better to study science than study the Bible, because at least Science can create stuff from scratch. That's why I always tell these Christians that the Big Bang is even more powerful than their God is, because even God can't change a law like inertia or gravity. But the Big Bang is so powerful that even if a law like inertia existed before it, it just slammed its fist on the table and overrode that law for the benefit of producing cool stuff like a cell, which is totally scientific anyway. See, even God can't do that. That's why I get so tired of Christians talking about miracles like Intelligent Design. Because scientists are so powerful that they can teach us about things like the Big Bang that are even more extraordinary and phenomenal than some Intelligent Design crap. That's peanuts compared to real science. That's like The Watchmen taking on the Thunder Cats. You know the Thunder Cats are going down cause The Watchmen don't necessarily play by the book. And that makes Science more exciting.
What I love about science is that any good scientist believes in the Big Bang Theory. What's really awesome about that is that scientists have proven that the law of inertia was created after the Big Bang Theory. Because something (or anything, or everything) came out of nothing by Chance, the law of inertia was developed right after it. In other words, before the Big Bang, an object that was standing still or didn't exist could still move or change its makeup without the interference of another object. But the cool thing about the Big Bang is that it changed all that. After the Big Bang, you have the law of inertia, which basically says that an object that is standing still can't move unless acted on by another object.
So, what I really love about the Big Bang is that it can actually create new scientific laws. Better to study science than study the Bible, because at least Science can create stuff from scratch. That's why I always tell these Christians that the Big Bang is even more powerful than their God is, because even God can't change a law like inertia or gravity. But the Big Bang is so powerful that even if a law like inertia existed before it, it just slammed its fist on the table and overrode that law for the benefit of producing cool stuff like a cell, which is totally scientific anyway. See, even God can't do that. That's why I get so tired of Christians talking about miracles like Intelligent Design. Because scientists are so powerful that they can teach us about things like the Big Bang that are even more extraordinary and phenomenal than some Intelligent Design crap. That's peanuts compared to real science. That's like The Watchmen taking on the Thunder Cats. You know the Thunder Cats are going down cause The Watchmen don't necessarily play by the book. And that makes Science more exciting.
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Termination
Someone recently asked this forward-thinking person how I am able to enjoy children and still be in favor of killing them. What an insane question! Obviously that person doesn't know a bit about the duality of man, or the inherent contradictions in the human psyche. Hindus know all about this. Kali, for example, is a goddess who is able to exhibit great mercy on the one hand, and extreme viciousness on the other. I have no problem with terminating children who have not seen the light of day, but once they do, we are pretty much obligated to keep them.
Maybe one of these days someone will wake up and realize that it would be beneficial for us to stretch the time frame a bit. It would be much more useful if we were able to legally terminate a child up until his or her second birthday. Once a child turns two-years-old, one would be obligated to keep it or give it to someone who wants it, but one would not be able to terminate it legally beyond that point.
This would solve much of the confusion about when a fetus is a living organism, or when it is morally acceptable to make a choice in favor of the parent(s). We would have a clear understanding of what is legally (and therefore morally) acceptable, and we could finally move past this archaic debate over human life.
Maybe one of these days someone will wake up and realize that it would be beneficial for us to stretch the time frame a bit. It would be much more useful if we were able to legally terminate a child up until his or her second birthday. Once a child turns two-years-old, one would be obligated to keep it or give it to someone who wants it, but one would not be able to terminate it legally beyond that point.
This would solve much of the confusion about when a fetus is a living organism, or when it is morally acceptable to make a choice in favor of the parent(s). We would have a clear understanding of what is legally (and therefore morally) acceptable, and we could finally move past this archaic debate over human life.
Friday, February 25, 2011
New
New is better. Face it. If it wasn't written on a smart phone today, it's not worth reading.
Religious people are idiots because they hold on to the past like it's money. I'm not religious, because I'm open-minded, and that means knowing what is not worth believing. I don't care if you can show me ontological proof for the existence of God. I'm open-minded to the possibility that God does not exist, and therefore I live my life freely, not bogged down by some closed-minded notion that this love of God you talk about is for everyone.
Open-minded means that you know beyond the shadow of a doubt that new information is far more superior to old information. Charles Dickens is just a bunch of hogwash. Give me a smart phone with Gears of War on it and now we're talking. Why would you read "Bleak House" when you can beat the shit out of some idiot on your phone?
The past is the past and has no bearing whatsoever on what is happening now, or what could possibly happen in the future. Listen, you know what Henry Ford said? "The past is bunk." That's Henry Ford. I wouldn't normally pay any attention to anything some idiot millionaire said, but this one, he means business. He was a beautiful guy who believed in communitarianism and community and everybody just pitching in what they have and nobody having too much more than anyone else. Funny that he never did. He had a lot of stuff. But I don't think the main point with him that you have to strive for is consistency. I think you gotta take his ideas and run with them. Ideas have no consequences. They are just ideas. I can't make you jump off a bridge unless you were already planning on taking the plunge. That's why I get irritated with these idiots who get frustrated that we're trying to teach first-graders about Marx and sexuality. They're just ideas. If you don't like it in America, land of ideas, go live somewhere else. If I was a parent, I would want my kids to know that they don't have to suffer through capitalism or monogamy. They need to know that they have a choice. They can demand a society in which doctors, strippers and landscape artists all make about the same paycheck. They can have consensual sex when they're ready—I say ten or eleven—but it all depends on the maturity level. Why settle for this intolerable system we have now? If you want to keep it, go somewhere else and start over. We're moving forward. Stop trying to hold everybody up. They built this country on lies. I want what's mine. Obama's trying to give me what I want, and you idiots are telling him he can't do it. What, you can't give me a little piece of your 300 million dollars? And you call this a democracy?
I wouldn't have kids though. Too loud. And you need to make at least $125,000 a year to have a kid. Or more. Plus they are annoying in airports.
The only ideas that matter are ideas of the future. If it was said a hundred years ago, who cares? If it was said two weeks ago, who cares? Tell me what they're going to say tomorrow. Talk to me about how we are going to respond to media content ten years from now. We already have more content than Dickens ever did. That man knew nothing about sexual freedom. Don't you think if he could change places with you for a week today he would do it? He'd be at some bar getting off, because during his time he had to repress himself and all that. I bet you in ten years, you'll be able to carry a handheld device that will broadcast live girls, and you'll have a hand that comes out of it to help you get off when you want. Or maybe not a hand. Some kind of an attachment. And there'll be one for the ladies too. But it will be the same thing. It won't be different, because we'll have a true society of gender equality, so porn device manufacturers won't be allowed, by Congress, to develop paraphernalia differently for the sexes. But I think trans-gender will still have it's own device, cause they seem to be able to run the show on that kind of thing. Maybe they'll have a special protective law that Congress will pass that will enable them to develop their own sex toys with immunity to the rules governing regular sex toy developers.
How can anyone live with any certainty or conviction about anything? How can you be sure about anything? The only thing I know for certain is that I like video games and fried food. Strangely, I'm not sure if I like sex any more. I liked it a lot when I was younger, and everybody just encouraged me to try everything out, and when I did, I just sort of lost interest. It's been hard for me to get into it ever since. I can't think about anything else besides technology and fried food. That's what consumes my thinking most of the time, and when I tried to pick up "Bleak House" I just thought "What the hell?" and went and got some fried chicken and got online and did a search for "busty coeds."
Conviction, resolve, certainty, truth and nobility are vague qualities belonging to a lost generation of unintelligent people who did not have running water or mobile phones. New is just far better than anything they had. I'll take Awareness over Conviction and Tolerance over Nobility any day. I'll take Workplace Fairness over Truth nine times out of ten.
The sky is a dull gray color as I write this. I'm feeling pretty washed out when I look at it. I was supposed to go out with this lady and her boyfriend later, but I think I'm going to cancel and just order in some food and watch this dating show.
Tolerance
People who are tolerant are not hateful like intolerant people. Intolerance is ignorance. I hate intolerant people. Christians are intolerant.
Christians are not as cool as Hindus, who are very tolerant of everyone because they don't confine God to some all-knowing Being who is all good. They know there are many sides to deities, who are often comprised of mercy and anger, hate and love, justice and domination, seriousness and silliness, and other seemingly incompatible values simultaneously.
Christians are also not as cool as Buddhists, who require a lifetime to focus on their selves and their own personal fulfillment. You may think that's selfish, but really they have it right. Why go on missions and try to persuade people to believe in some Absolute Truth? That's what Christians do, under the guise of helping people spend eternity with God. If there even is an eternity, don't you think we would know about it? The fact that someone thought of eternity before they used the scientific method proves that it can't exist scientifically. And Christians never learn that truth is subjective. It's different for everyone individually. There is no external source that you can make a judgement about everything by. Plus, Christians killed people in the Dark Ages.
Islam is kind of uncool, but it definitely has more novelty for forward thinking people in our country here, because it's more peaceful than stubborn, uneducated people say it is. Islam is not about killing a bunch of infidels. When the Koran says that the only time it is permissible for a child of Allah to lie is when they are doing it to befriend an infidel so that they can either convert or kill them, it doesn't mean what people who take it literally tell you it means. It's more of a poetic use of language. The Koran is beautiful. I haven't read any of it personally (because I'm reading a book by Dave Eggers right now, who is my favorite personality next to Oprah and Obama), but I hear they teach it in college and that's all I need to know. If they're teaching it in college, you know it's good.
Just about every religion besides Christianity is tolerable. I can't stand Protestant Christians because they are so reluctant to change. Any change is better than no change at all. We need to always be moving. Even if you don't know where you're going, you keep going until you come to a stop, or run into something. That's what my aunt told me when I was doing the bumper cars when I was little, and I think the same applies to social progress. I am a firm believer in revolutions and taking wealth from rich idiots who don't deserve it. I think Bolsheviks are cool and beautiful. And in my heart I feel that change is progress, even when you are going anywhere. Anywhere is better than nowhere. Standing still is revolting. I hate anything or anyone who talks about reflecting or meditating, except for Buddhists, who I really like. Something is bound to fall into place when you are moving along and progressing.
I can't stand Christians because they talk about love but they also talk about people having to change. Why are you always trying to help people change, Christian? Why can't you let things be as they are?
Christians say that God hates sin but loves the sinner. I say that the word "sin" is irrelevant and intolerable. I don't believe sin exists. Who are you to tell me what is sin? What is sin to me may not be sin to you. It's all subjective. Plus, Science tells us that people are born certain ways. If someone is born gay, they can't help what attracts them. Let's say I am born gay. Maybe I don't even want to be gay. Maybe I find the thought of putting my putter in the anus of another man repulsive. Well, if I'm born gay, I'm going to do it whether I choose to or not. I may hate it, but if that's what my brain says to do, I have no choice. I may even know that it's unclean and unsafe, but if I'm born that way, with that chemical difference in my brain, it's not my fault I do anal sex even if I don't want to. Plus, why wouldn't I do it if my brain says to do it? When has anybody's brain ever been wrong about anything? If it's in your brain, it's defensible. How do you think people take a plea of insanity? Or alcoholics? You think they hold them responsible for running someone over because they were drinking? No. Of course not. They have a chemical propensity for alcoholism, and therefore people just can't ask them to choose something different.
Christians say that you can change being gay if you want to. That's why nobody ever changes it, because they don't want to feel like they could have changed it, even if they want to. That's why I think anal sex, hot dogs, Buddhism, peace, free-trade coffee, peaceful and gentle Muslims, etc, etc, are all great. What I can't tolerate is Christians because everything is so categorical with them. There is no room for mucking about with the Missus, if you catch my meaning.
Tolerance is the only way to go, because then people can have the freedom to do whatever, and everybody is happy, except for people that believe in Right and Wrong, and those are on the decline, thank God.
Christians are not as cool as Hindus, who are very tolerant of everyone because they don't confine God to some all-knowing Being who is all good. They know there are many sides to deities, who are often comprised of mercy and anger, hate and love, justice and domination, seriousness and silliness, and other seemingly incompatible values simultaneously.
Christians are also not as cool as Buddhists, who require a lifetime to focus on their selves and their own personal fulfillment. You may think that's selfish, but really they have it right. Why go on missions and try to persuade people to believe in some Absolute Truth? That's what Christians do, under the guise of helping people spend eternity with God. If there even is an eternity, don't you think we would know about it? The fact that someone thought of eternity before they used the scientific method proves that it can't exist scientifically. And Christians never learn that truth is subjective. It's different for everyone individually. There is no external source that you can make a judgement about everything by. Plus, Christians killed people in the Dark Ages.
Islam is kind of uncool, but it definitely has more novelty for forward thinking people in our country here, because it's more peaceful than stubborn, uneducated people say it is. Islam is not about killing a bunch of infidels. When the Koran says that the only time it is permissible for a child of Allah to lie is when they are doing it to befriend an infidel so that they can either convert or kill them, it doesn't mean what people who take it literally tell you it means. It's more of a poetic use of language. The Koran is beautiful. I haven't read any of it personally (because I'm reading a book by Dave Eggers right now, who is my favorite personality next to Oprah and Obama), but I hear they teach it in college and that's all I need to know. If they're teaching it in college, you know it's good.
Just about every religion besides Christianity is tolerable. I can't stand Protestant Christians because they are so reluctant to change. Any change is better than no change at all. We need to always be moving. Even if you don't know where you're going, you keep going until you come to a stop, or run into something. That's what my aunt told me when I was doing the bumper cars when I was little, and I think the same applies to social progress. I am a firm believer in revolutions and taking wealth from rich idiots who don't deserve it. I think Bolsheviks are cool and beautiful. And in my heart I feel that change is progress, even when you are going anywhere. Anywhere is better than nowhere. Standing still is revolting. I hate anything or anyone who talks about reflecting or meditating, except for Buddhists, who I really like. Something is bound to fall into place when you are moving along and progressing.
I can't stand Christians because they talk about love but they also talk about people having to change. Why are you always trying to help people change, Christian? Why can't you let things be as they are?
Christians say that God hates sin but loves the sinner. I say that the word "sin" is irrelevant and intolerable. I don't believe sin exists. Who are you to tell me what is sin? What is sin to me may not be sin to you. It's all subjective. Plus, Science tells us that people are born certain ways. If someone is born gay, they can't help what attracts them. Let's say I am born gay. Maybe I don't even want to be gay. Maybe I find the thought of putting my putter in the anus of another man repulsive. Well, if I'm born gay, I'm going to do it whether I choose to or not. I may hate it, but if that's what my brain says to do, I have no choice. I may even know that it's unclean and unsafe, but if I'm born that way, with that chemical difference in my brain, it's not my fault I do anal sex even if I don't want to. Plus, why wouldn't I do it if my brain says to do it? When has anybody's brain ever been wrong about anything? If it's in your brain, it's defensible. How do you think people take a plea of insanity? Or alcoholics? You think they hold them responsible for running someone over because they were drinking? No. Of course not. They have a chemical propensity for alcoholism, and therefore people just can't ask them to choose something different.
Christians say that you can change being gay if you want to. That's why nobody ever changes it, because they don't want to feel like they could have changed it, even if they want to. That's why I think anal sex, hot dogs, Buddhism, peace, free-trade coffee, peaceful and gentle Muslims, etc, etc, are all great. What I can't tolerate is Christians because everything is so categorical with them. There is no room for mucking about with the Missus, if you catch my meaning.
Tolerance is the only way to go, because then people can have the freedom to do whatever, and everybody is happy, except for people that believe in Right and Wrong, and those are on the decline, thank God.
Rehabilitation
I am a forward thinking person. I am tired of old thinking. I am tired of people telling me what to do and how to dress and what to think. I am tired of people talking about what's right and what's wrong. Who are you to tell me what is right and what is wrong? That is all subjective territory. The only way to judge that is through personal, internal criteria. And since we've learned that Right and Wrong are subjective and vastly different from person to person, of course, we have become more Multicultural and Diverse and grown intellectually, not to mention that we have less wars and people eat healthier and we are more Aware and Tolerant and better off generally.
Death row is a miserable place, full of sorrow and pain, and I am tired of people being taught not to kill by being put there. We even kill people to show them that killing is wrong. How in the world are we ever going to give someone a chance to not kill if we kill them after they have only killed three or four people? Human life is very important, and we cannot take a human life just because that life took a few other lives. What a contradiction!
What we need to do is have special jails where people are put if they have killed someone due to a chemical imbalance or a psychological condition, which is very seldom their fault. These special jails would be separate from the regular jails that house people who have done something they know is wrong, such as Hate Crimes, Intolerance, Gay-Bashing, Protesting at a Termination Clinic, and other horrible things like that.
People who are not to blame for their murderous instincts should not be killed just to make the relatives of the dead people they killed feel better. You probably know already, but killing someone does not make a situation more just. We can raise taxes, if we need to, to support people in special prisons who have killed other people due to chemical imbalances and psychological conditions. Thank God for psychologists who have worked so hard ever since William James to help us basically understand that we need to be more sensitive to people who have taken another life. I'm sure they must be just devastated about what's happened. There is probably enough horror for them just knowing and living with what they have done. Killing them doesn't really solve anything. Science tells us that people cannot be held responsible for what they do sometimes, and I know Science is right because Science helped us prove that there is no God and that we are products of by-products and random matter.
We need to rehabilitate mass murderers and serial killers and give them a chance to learn from their mistakes. We need to help them see that killing people is not the answer. We need to be more forgiving to them so that they can learn from us about humanity and how to be more humanistic.
There is a man right now who has been sentenced to death because he raped a nine-year-old boy and an eleven-year-old girl and their mother, and after he raped them, he killed them, and then he killed their father. Do you think that man knows right from wrong? And are we supposed to kill him because he doesn't know right from wrong? We are supposed to help him rehabilitate. The man needs a chance to learn from his mistakes.
There is no one more vicious than a person who wants to kill a killer, not even the killer.
Death row is a miserable place, full of sorrow and pain, and I am tired of people being taught not to kill by being put there. We even kill people to show them that killing is wrong. How in the world are we ever going to give someone a chance to not kill if we kill them after they have only killed three or four people? Human life is very important, and we cannot take a human life just because that life took a few other lives. What a contradiction!
What we need to do is have special jails where people are put if they have killed someone due to a chemical imbalance or a psychological condition, which is very seldom their fault. These special jails would be separate from the regular jails that house people who have done something they know is wrong, such as Hate Crimes, Intolerance, Gay-Bashing, Protesting at a Termination Clinic, and other horrible things like that.
People who are not to blame for their murderous instincts should not be killed just to make the relatives of the dead people they killed feel better. You probably know already, but killing someone does not make a situation more just. We can raise taxes, if we need to, to support people in special prisons who have killed other people due to chemical imbalances and psychological conditions. Thank God for psychologists who have worked so hard ever since William James to help us basically understand that we need to be more sensitive to people who have taken another life. I'm sure they must be just devastated about what's happened. There is probably enough horror for them just knowing and living with what they have done. Killing them doesn't really solve anything. Science tells us that people cannot be held responsible for what they do sometimes, and I know Science is right because Science helped us prove that there is no God and that we are products of by-products and random matter.
We need to rehabilitate mass murderers and serial killers and give them a chance to learn from their mistakes. We need to help them see that killing people is not the answer. We need to be more forgiving to them so that they can learn from us about humanity and how to be more humanistic.
There is a man right now who has been sentenced to death because he raped a nine-year-old boy and an eleven-year-old girl and their mother, and after he raped them, he killed them, and then he killed their father. Do you think that man knows right from wrong? And are we supposed to kill him because he doesn't know right from wrong? We are supposed to help him rehabilitate. The man needs a chance to learn from his mistakes.
There is no one more vicious than a person who wants to kill a killer, not even the killer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)