New

New is better. Face it. If it wasn't written on a smart phone today, it's not worth reading.

Religious people are idiots because they hold on to the past like it's money. I'm not religious, because I'm open-minded, and that means knowing what is not worth believing. I don't care if you can show me ontological proof for the existence of God. I'm open-minded to the possibility that God does not exist, and therefore I live my life freely, not bogged down by some closed-minded notion that this love of God you talk about is for everyone. 

Open-minded means that you know beyond the shadow of a doubt that new information is far more superior to old information. Charles Dickens is just a bunch of hogwash. Give me a smart phone with Gears of War on it and now we're talking. Why would you read "Bleak House" when you can beat the shit out of some idiot on your phone? 

The past is the past and has no bearing whatsoever on what is happening now, or what could possibly happen in the future. Listen, you know what Henry Ford said? "The past is bunk." That's Henry Ford. I wouldn't normally pay any attention to anything some idiot millionaire said, but this one, he means business. He was a beautiful guy who believed in communitarianism and community and everybody just pitching in what they have and nobody having too much more than anyone else. Funny that he never did. He had a lot of stuff. But I don't think the main point with him that you have to strive for is consistency. I think you gotta take his ideas and run with them. Ideas have no consequences. They are just ideas. I can't make you jump off a bridge unless you were already planning on taking the plunge. That's why I get irritated with these idiots who get frustrated that we're trying to teach first-graders about Marx and sexuality. They're just ideas. If you don't like it in America, land of ideas, go live somewhere else. If I was a parent, I would want my kids to know that they don't have to suffer through capitalism or monogamy. They need to know that they have a choice. They can demand a society in which doctors, strippers and landscape artists all make about the same paycheck. They can have consensual sex when they're ready—I say ten or eleven—but it all depends on the maturity level. Why settle for this intolerable system we have now? If you want to keep it, go somewhere else and start over. We're moving forward. Stop trying to hold everybody up. They built this country on lies. I want what's mine. Obama's trying to give me what I want, and you idiots are telling him he can't do it. What, you can't give me a little piece of your 300 million dollars? And you call this a democracy?

I wouldn't have kids though. Too loud. And you need to make at least $125,000 a year to have a kid. Or more. Plus they are annoying in airports.

The only ideas that matter are ideas of the future. If it was said a hundred years ago, who cares? If it was said two weeks ago, who cares? Tell me what they're going to say tomorrow. Talk to me about how we are going to respond to media content ten years from now. We already have more content than Dickens ever did. That man knew nothing about sexual freedom. Don't you think if he could change places with you for a week today he would do it? He'd be at some bar getting off, because during his time he had to repress himself and all that. I bet you in ten years, you'll be able to carry a handheld device that will broadcast live girls, and you'll have a hand that comes out of it to help you get off when you want. Or maybe not a hand. Some kind of an attachment. And there'll be one for the ladies too. But it will be the same thing. It won't be different, because we'll have a true society of gender equality, so porn device manufacturers won't be allowed, by Congress, to develop paraphernalia differently for the sexes. But I think trans-gender will still have it's own device, cause they seem to be able to run the show on that kind of thing. Maybe they'll have a special protective law that Congress will pass that will enable them to develop their own sex toys with immunity to the rules governing regular sex toy developers.

How can anyone live with any certainty or conviction about anything? How can you be sure about anything? The only thing I know for certain is that I like video games and fried food. Strangely, I'm not sure if I like sex any more. I liked it a lot when I was younger, and everybody just encouraged me to try everything out, and when I did, I just sort of lost interest. It's been hard for me to get into it ever since. I can't think about anything else besides technology and fried food. That's what consumes my thinking most of the time, and when I tried to pick up "Bleak House" I just thought "What the hell?" and went and got some fried chicken and got online and did a search for "busty coeds."

Conviction, resolve, certainty, truth and nobility are vague qualities belonging to a lost generation of unintelligent people who did not have running water or mobile phones. New is just far better than anything they had. I'll take Awareness over Conviction and Tolerance over Nobility any day. I'll take Workplace Fairness over Truth nine times out of ten.

The sky is a dull gray color as I write this. I'm feeling pretty washed out when I look at it. I was supposed to go out with this lady and her boyfriend later, but I think I'm going to cancel and just order in some food and watch this dating show.

Tolerance

People who are tolerant are not hateful like intolerant people. Intolerance is ignorance. I hate intolerant people. Christians are intolerant.

Christians are not as cool as Hindus, who are very tolerant of everyone because they don't confine God to some all-knowing Being who is all good. They know there are many sides to deities, who are often comprised of mercy and anger, hate and love, justice and domination, seriousness and silliness, and other seemingly incompatible values simultaneously.

Christians are also not as cool as Buddhists, who require a lifetime to focus on their selves and their own personal fulfillment. You may think that's selfish, but really they have it right. Why go on missions and try to persuade people to believe in some Absolute Truth? That's what Christians do, under the guise of helping people spend eternity with God. If there even is an eternity, don't you think we would know about it? The fact that someone thought of eternity before they used the scientific method proves that it can't exist scientifically. And Christians never learn that truth is subjective. It's different for everyone individually. There is no external source that you can make a judgement about everything by. Plus, Christians killed people in the Dark Ages.

Islam is kind of uncool, but it definitely has more novelty for forward thinking people in our country here, because it's more peaceful than stubborn, uneducated people say it is. Islam is not about killing a bunch of infidels. When the Koran says that the only time it is permissible for a child of Allah to lie is when they are doing it to befriend an infidel so that they can either convert or kill them, it doesn't mean what people who take it literally tell you it means. It's more of a poetic use of language. The Koran is beautiful. I haven't read any of it personally (because I'm reading a book by Dave Eggers right now, who is my favorite personality next to Oprah and Obama), but I hear they teach it in college and that's all I need to know. If they're teaching it in college, you know it's good.

Just about every religion besides Christianity is tolerable. I can't stand Protestant Christians because they are so reluctant to change. Any change is better than no change at all. We need to always be moving. Even if you don't know where you're going, you keep going until you come to a stop, or run into something. That's what my aunt told me when I was doing the bumper cars when I was little, and I think the same applies to social progress. I am a firm believer in revolutions and taking wealth from rich idiots who don't deserve it. I think Bolsheviks are cool and beautiful. And in my heart I feel that change is progress, even when you are going anywhere. Anywhere is better than nowhere. Standing still is revolting. I hate anything or anyone who talks about reflecting or meditating, except for Buddhists, who I really like. Something is bound to fall into place when you are moving along and progressing.

I can't stand Christians because they talk about love but they also talk about people having to change. Why are you always trying to help people change, Christian? Why can't you let things be as they are?

Christians say that God hates sin but loves the sinner. I say that the word "sin" is irrelevant and intolerable. I don't believe sin exists. Who are you to tell me what is sin? What is sin to me may not be sin to you. It's all subjective. Plus, Science tells us that people are born certain ways. If someone is born gay, they can't help what attracts them. Let's say I am born gay. Maybe I don't even want to be gay. Maybe I find the thought of putting my putter in the anus of another man repulsive. Well, if I'm born gay, I'm going to do it whether I choose to or not. I may hate it, but if that's what my brain says to do, I have no choice. I may even know that it's unclean and unsafe, but if I'm born that way, with that chemical difference in my brain, it's not my fault I do anal sex even if I don't want to. Plus, why wouldn't I do it if my brain says to do it? When has anybody's brain ever been wrong about anything? If it's in your brain, it's defensible. How do you think people take a plea of insanity? Or alcoholics? You think they hold them responsible for running someone over because they were drinking? No. Of course not. They have a chemical propensity for alcoholism, and therefore people just can't ask them to choose something different.

Christians say that you can change being gay if you want to. That's why nobody ever changes it, because they don't want to feel like they could have changed it, even if they want to. That's why I think anal sex, hot dogs, Buddhism, peace, free-trade coffee, peaceful and gentle Muslims, etc, etc, are all great. What I can't tolerate is Christians because everything is so categorical with them. There is no room for mucking about with the Missus, if you catch my meaning.

Tolerance is the only way to go, because then people can have the freedom to do whatever, and everybody is happy, except for people that believe in Right and Wrong, and those are on the decline, thank God.

Rehabilitation

I am a forward thinking person. I am tired of old thinking. I am tired of people telling me what to do and how to dress and what to think. I am tired of people talking about what's right and what's wrong. Who are you to tell me what is right and what is wrong? That is all subjective territory. The only way to judge that is through personal, internal criteria. And since we've learned that Right and Wrong are subjective and vastly different from person to person, of course, we have become more Multicultural and Diverse and grown intellectually, not to mention that we have less wars and people eat healthier and we are more Aware and Tolerant and better off generally.

Death row is a miserable place, full of sorrow and pain, and I am tired of people being taught not to kill by being put there. We even kill people to show them that killing is wrong. How in the world are we ever going to give someone a chance to not kill if we kill them after they have only killed three or four people? Human life is very important, and we cannot take a human life just because that life took a few other lives. What a contradiction!

What we need to do is have special jails where people are put if they have killed someone due to a chemical imbalance or a psychological condition, which is very seldom their fault. These special jails would be separate from the regular jails that house people who have done something they know is wrong, such as Hate Crimes, Intolerance, Gay-Bashing, Protesting at a Termination Clinic, and other horrible things like that.

People who are not to blame for their murderous instincts should not be killed just to make the relatives of the dead people they killed feel better. You probably know already, but killing someone does not make a situation more just. We can raise taxes, if we need to, to support people in special prisons who have killed other people due to chemical imbalances and psychological conditions. Thank God for psychologists who have worked so hard ever since William James to help us basically understand that we need to be more sensitive to people who have taken another life. I'm sure they must be just devastated about what's happened. There is probably enough horror for them just knowing and living with what they have done. Killing them doesn't really solve anything. Science tells us that people cannot be held responsible for what they do sometimes, and I know Science is right because Science helped us prove that there is no God and that we are products of by-products and random matter.

We need to rehabilitate mass murderers and serial killers and give them a chance to learn from their mistakes. We need to help them see that killing people is not the answer. We need to be more forgiving to them so that they can learn from us about humanity and how to be more humanistic.

There is a man right now who has been sentenced to death because he raped a nine-year-old boy and an eleven-year-old girl and their mother, and after he raped them, he killed them, and then he killed their father. Do you think that man knows right from wrong? And are we supposed to kill him because he doesn't know right from wrong? We are supposed to help him rehabilitate. The man needs a chance to learn from his mistakes.

There is no one more vicious than a person who wants to kill a killer, not even the killer.